-
1.
Standardizing Randomized Controlled Trials in Celiac Disease: An International Multidisciplinary Appropriateness Study.
Lebwohl, B, Ma, C, Lagana, SM, Pai, RK, Baker, KA, Zayadi, A, Hogan, M, Bouma, G, Cellier, C, Goldsmith, JD, et al
Gastroenterology. 2024;(1):88-102
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS There is a need to develop safe and effective pharmacologic options for the treatment of celiac disease (CeD); however, consensus on the appropriate design and configuration of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in this population is lacking. METHODS A 2-round modified Research and Development/University of California Los Angeles Appropriateness Method study was conducted. Eighteen gastroenterologists (adult and pediatric) and gastrointestinal pathologists voted on statements pertaining to the configuration of CeD RCTs, inclusion and exclusion criteria, gluten challenge, and trial outcomes. Two RCT designs were considered, representing the following distinct clinical scenarios for which pharmacotherapy may be used: trials incorporating a gluten challenge to simulate exposure; and trials evaluating reversal of histologic changes, despite attempted adherence to a gluten-free diet. Each statement was rated as appropriate, uncertain, or inappropriate, using a 9-point Likert scale. RESULTS For trials evaluating prevention of relapse after gluten challenge, participants adherent to a gluten-free diet for 12 months or more with normal or near-normal-sized villi should be enrolled. Gluten challenge should be FODMAPS (fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols) free, and efficacy evaluated using histology with a secondary patient-reported outcome measure. For trials evaluating reversal of villus atrophy, the panel voted it appropriate to enroll participants with a baseline villus height to crypt depth ratio ≤2 and measure efficacy using a primary histologic end point. Guidance for measuring histologic, endoscopic, and patient-reported outcomes in adult and pediatric patients with CeD are provided, along with recommendations regarding the merits and limitations of different end points. CONCLUSIONS We developed standardized recommendations for clinical trial design, eligibility criteria, outcome measures, gluten challenge, and disease evaluations for RCTs in patients with CeD.
-
2.
Safety and tolerability of KAN-101, a liver-targeted immune tolerance therapy, in patients with coeliac disease (ACeD): a phase 1 trial.
Murray, JA, Wassaf, D, Dunn, K, Arora, S, Winkle, P, Stacey, H, Cooper, S, Goldstein, KE, Manchanda, R, Kontos, S, et al
The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology. 2023;(8):735-747
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coeliac disease management is limited to strict adherence to a gluten-free diet with no approved therapies. This first-in-human phase 1 study evaluated the safety and tolerability of KAN-101, a liver-targeting glycosylation signature conjugated to a deaminated gliadin peptide designed to induce immune tolerance to gliadin. METHODS Adults (aged 18-70 years) with biopsy-confirmed, HLA-DQ2.5 genotype coeliac disease were enrolled from clinical research units and hospitals in the USA. Part A of the trial was an open-label, single ascending dose study of intravenous KAN-101 using sentinel dosing in evaluation of the following cohorts: 0·15 mg/kg, 0·3 mg/kg, 0·6 mg/kg, 1·2 mg/kg, and 1·5 mg/kg. Following safety monitoring committee review of the 0·3 mg/kg dose level in part A, part B was initiated as a randomised, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending dose study. In part B, interactive response technology was used to randomly assign (5:1) patients to receive intravenous KAN-101 (0·15 mg/kg, 0·3 mg/kg, or 0·6 mg/kg) or placebo following a 1:1 assignment of the first two eligible patients in each cohort for sentinel dosing. Patients in part B received three administrations of KAN-101 or placebo followed by a 3-day oral gluten challenge (9 g per day) 1 week after completing dosing. Study personnel and patients were masked to treatment assignments in part B, and not in part A. The primary endpoint was the incidence and severity of adverse events with escalating doses of KAN-101, assessed in all patients who received any amount of study drug based on dose level received. The secondary endpoint was assessment of plasma concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters of KAN-101 following single and multiple doses, assessed in all patients who received at least one dose and had one or more values for drug concentration. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04248855, and is completed. FINDINGS Between Feb 7, 2020, and Oct 8, 2021, 41 patients were enrolled at ten US sites. 14 patients were assigned to part A (four 0·15 mg/kg, three 0·3 mg/kg, three 0·6 mg/kg, three 1·2 mg/kg, one 1·5 mg/kg) and 27 patients to part B (six 0·15 mg/kg with two placebo, seven 0·3 mg/kg with two placebo, and eight 0·6 mg/kg with two placebo). Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 11 (79%) of 14 patients in part A and 18 (67%) of 27 in part B (placebo two [33%] of six patients; KAN-101 16 [76%] of 21 patients), were grade 2 or lower, and were mild to moderate in severity. The most commonly observed adverse events were nausea, diarrhoea, abdominal pain, and vomiting, consistent with symptoms had by patients with coeliac disease on gluten ingestion. No grade 3-4 adverse events, serious adverse events, dose-limiting toxicities, or deaths occurred. Pharmacokinetic analyses showed KAN-101 was cleared from systemic circulation within roughly 6 h with a geometric mean half-life of 3·72 min (CV% 6·5%) to 31·72 min (83·7%), and no accumulation with repeated dosing. INTERPRETATION KAN-101 has an acceptable safety profile in patients with coeliac disease with no dose-limiting toxicities and no maximum tolerated dose was observed. Rapid systemic clearance of KAN-101 was observed and no accumulation on repeated dosing. A future study will evaluate the safety and efficacy, including biomarker responses with a gluten challenge, of KAN-101 at doses 0·6 mg/kg and greater in patients with coeliac disease. FUNDING Kanyos Bio.
-
3.
Plasma IL-2 and Symptoms Response after Acute Gluten Exposure in Subjects With Celiac Disease or Nonceliac Gluten Sensitivity.
Cartee, AK, Choung, RS, King, KS, Wang, S, Dzuris, JL, Anderson, RP, Van Dyke, CT, Hinson, CA, Marietta, E, Katzka, DA, et al
The American journal of gastroenterology. 2022;(2):319-326
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Treated patients with celiac disease (CeD) and nonceliac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) report acute, transient, incompletely understood symptoms after suspected gluten exposure. To determine whether (i) blinded gluten exposure induces symptoms, (ii) subjects accurately identify gluten exposure, and (iii) serum interleukin-2 (IL-2) levels distinguish CeD from NCGS subjects after gluten exposure. METHODS Sixty subjects (n = 20 treated, healed CeD; n = 20 treated NCGS; n = 20 controls) were block randomized to a single, double-blind sham (rice flour) or 3-g gluten challenge with 72-hours follow-up. Twelve serial questionnaires (100 mm visual analog scale; pain, bloating, nausea, and fatigue) and 10 serial plasma samples were collected. Mucosal permeability was assessed using both urinary lactulose-13C mannitol ratios and endoscopic mucosal impedance. RESULTS Thirty-five of 40 (83%) subjects with CeD and NCGS reported symptoms with gluten (8 CeD, 9 NCGS) and sham (9 CeD, 9 NCGS) compared with 9 of 20 (45%) controls after gluten (n = 6) and sham (n = 3). There was no significant difference in symptoms among groups. Only 2 of 10 subjects with CeD and 4 of 10 NCGS identified gluten, whereas 8 of 10 subjects with CeD and 5 of 10 NCGS identified sham. A significant plasma IL-2 increase occurred only in subjects with CeD after gluten, peaking at 3 hours and normalizing within 24 hours postchallenge despite no significant intestinal permeability change from baseline. DISCUSSION Symptoms do not reliably indicate gluten exposure in either subjects with CeD or NCGS. IL-2 production indicates a rapid-onset gluten-induced T-cell activation in CeD despite long-standing treatment. The effector site is unknown, given no increased intestinal permeability after gluten.
-
4.
Connecting inorganic mercury and lead measurements in blood to dietary sources of exposure that may impact child development.
Dufault, RJ, Wolle, MM, Kingston, HMS, Gilbert, SG, Murray, JA
World journal of methodology. 2021;(4):144-159
Abstract
Pre-natal and post-natal chemical exposures and co-exposures from a variety of sources including contaminated air, water, soil, and food are common and associated with poorer birth and child health outcomes. Poor diet is a contributing factor in the development of child behavioral disorders. Child behavior and learning can be adversely impacted when gene expression is altered by dietary transcription factors such as zinc insufficiency or deficiency or by exposure to toxic substances permitted in our food supply such as mercury, lead, or organophosphate pesticide residue. Children with autism spectrum disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorders exhibit decreased or impaired PON1 gene activity which is needed by the body to metabolize and excrete neurotoxic organophosphate pesticides. In this current review we present an updated macroepigenetic model that explains how dietary inorganic mercury and lead exposures from unhealthy diet may lead to elevated blood mercury and/or lead levels and the development of symptoms associated with the autism and attention deficit-hyperactivity disorders. PON1 gene activity may be suppressed by inadequate dietary calcium, selenium, and fatty acid intake or exposures to lead or mercury. The model may assist clinicians in diagnosing and treating the symptoms associated with these childhood neurodevelopmental disorders. Recommendations for future research are provided based on the updated model and review of recently published literature.
-
5.
The Significance and Clinical Outcome of Lymphocytic Duodenosis in Children: Mayo Clinic Experience and Systematic Review.
Devara, J, Alsawas, M, Larson, JJ, Mounajjed, T, Murray, JA, Absah, I
Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition. 2021;(2):288-293
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lymphocytic duodenosis (LD) defined as increased intraepithelial lymphocytes >25 intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) per 100 epithelial cells with normal villous architecture is associated with many gastrointestinal (GI) disorders. We aim to assess the rate and outcome of LD in children and perform a systematic review. METHOD We reviewed all children (<18 years) who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with duodenal biopsy between January 2000 and June 2019 to identify LD cases and control group. Demographics, clinical, and pathologic information were reviewed and recorded. A systematic review including our findings was performed. RESULTS During the study period 12,744 children underwent an EGD with biopsies. Of those, we identified 426 children with LD (3%) and 474 controls. The median age in years was 10.7 and 12.6 and there were 254 (60%) and 278 (59%) girls in the LD and control group, respectively. The most common presenting symptoms in both groups were abdominal pain (52%), gastroesophageal acid reflux disease (18%), diarrhea (16%), and vomiting (12%). Diarrhea (21% vs 12%, P < 0.001) and constipation (2% vs 0.4%, P = 0.021) were statistically different between the LD and control group, respectively. Median follow-up (range) is 3.6 (0.0, 190.9) and 3.1 (0.0, 194.2) in the LD and control group, respectively. CD (5% vs 0%, P < 0.001), Crohn disease (9% vs 3%, P = 0.003) and Helicobacter pylori gastritis (3% vs 1%, P = 0.021) were more common in the LD group. CONCLUSIONS The Rate of LD in children is similar to reported rate in adults. In the absence of Crohn disease, CD or H. Pylori, LD seems to be a benign and transient histologic finding in children.
-
6.
Nonceliac Gluten and Wheat Sensitivity.
Khan, A, Suarez, MG, Murray, JA
Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association. 2020;(9):1913-1922.e1
Abstract
Non-celiac gluten and/or wheat sensitivity (NCGS) is thought to be an immune-mediated reaction to gluten or other components of wheat (eg, fructans or amylase trypsin inhibitors) with intestinal and extraintestinal symptoms which improve once gluten and/or wheat is eliminated from the diet and after a diagnosis of celiac disease and wheat allergy have been excluded with appropriate testing. However, there is a great deal of skepticism within the scientific community questioning the existence of NCGS as a distinct clinical disorder. There are no strict diagnostic criteria and a placebo-controlled rechallenge trial has been recommended for diagnosis. In research settings, a double-blind placebo-controlled rechallenge trial has been recommended for diagnosis. There are limited studies estimating the prevalence of NCGS using this study design. The existing studies have variable results likely due to the lack of a uniform diagnostic criterion, a great deal of dependence on the patient's perception of symptoms and a large nocebo effect in existing studies. In clinical practice, a single blind placebo-controlled rechallenge trial has been recommended for diagnosis. The pathogenesis of NCGS is unclear and there is no known biomarker or diagnostic histologic lesion for this condition. It is important to adopt a multidisciplinary team approach to patients with suspected NCGS with involvement of the primary care doctor, gastroenterologist, pathologist and nutritionist who may play an important role in diagnosis and treatment. There may especially be a role in elimination of food containing high quantity of both gluten and fructans. Furthermore, patients should be educated on the nutritional implications of consuming a long-term gluten-free diet.
-
7.
AGA Clinical Practice Update on Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth: Expert Review.
Quigley, EMM, Murray, JA, Pimentel, M
Gastroenterology. 2020;(4):1526-1532
Abstract
DESCRIPTION Thanks to ready access to hydrogen breath testing, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is now commonly diagnosed among individuals presenting with a variety of gastrointestinal and even nongastrointestinal symptoms and is increasingly implicated in lay press and media in the causation of a diverse array of disorders. Its definition, however, remains controversial and true prevalence, accordingly, undefined. The purpose of this review, therefore, was to provide a historical background to the concept of SIBO, critically review current concepts of SIBO (including symptomatology, pathophysiology, clinical consequences, diagnosis and treatment), define unanswered questions and provide a road map toward their resolution. METHODS Best Practice Advice statements were developed following discussion by the 3 authors. Two authors each developed text around certain Best Practice Advice based on a review of available literature. All 3 authors reviewed the complete draft and after discussion, redrafting, and further review and revision, all of the authors agreed on a final draft. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: The definition of SIBO as a clinical entity lacks precision and consistency; it is a term generally applied to a clinical disorder where symptoms, clinical signs, and/or laboratory abnormalities are attributed to changes in the numbers of bacteria or in the composition of the bacterial population in the small intestine. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Symptoms traditionally linked to SIBO include bloating, diarrhea, and abdominal pain/discomfort. Steatorrhea may be seen in more severe cases. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: There is insufficient evidence to support the use of inflammatory markers, such as fecal calprotectin to detect SIBO. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Laboratory findings can include elevated folate and, less commonly, vitamin B-12 deficiency, or other nutritional deficiencies. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: A major impediment to our ability to accurately define SIBO is our limited understanding of normal small intestinal microbial populations-progress in sampling technology and techniques to enumerate bacterial populations and their metabolic products should provide much needed clarity. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Controversy remains concerning the role of SIBO in the pathogenesis of common functional symptoms, such as those regarded as components of irritable bowel syndrome. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Management should focus on the identification and correction (where possible) of underlying causes, correction of nutritional deficiencies, and the administration of antibiotics. This is especially important for patients with significant maldigestion and malabsorption. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: Although irritable bowel syndrome has been shown to respond to therapy with a poorly absorbed antibiotic, the role of SIBO or its eradication in the genesis of this response warrants further confirmation in randomized controlled trials. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: There is a limited database to guide the clinician in developing antibiotic strategies for SIBO, in any context. Therapy remains, for the most part, empiric but must be ever mindful of the potential risks of long-term broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy.
-
8.
Management of Small Bowel Villous Atrophy in Patients Seronegative for Celiac Disease.
Jansson-Knodell, CL, Murray, JA, Rubio-Tapia, A
The American journal of gastroenterology. 2020;(4):492-497
-
9.
The Liver and Celiac Disease.
Rubio-Tapia, A, Murray, JA
Clinics in liver disease. 2019;(2):167-176
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Celiac disease is a multisystem disorder. Celiac hepatitis characterized by gluten-responsive mild elevation of transaminases is the more common liver manifestation of celiac disease. Celiac disease may also be associated or coexist with other chronic liver disorders. Shared genetic risk and increased intestinal permeability have been suggested to be the most relevant events in the pathogenesis of liver injury in celiac disease. The aim of this article is to review the full spectrum of liver disorders in patients with celiac disease.
-
10.
AGA Clinical Practice Update on Diagnosis and Monitoring of Celiac Disease-Changing Utility of Serology and Histologic Measures: Expert Review.
Husby, S, Murray, JA, Katzka, DA
Gastroenterology. 2019;(4):885-889
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this clinical practice update is to define key modalities in the diagnosis and monitoring of celiac disease (CD) in adults as well as in children and adolescents. METHODS The recommendations outlined in this expert review are based on available published evidence, including cohort and case-control studies of the diagnostic process as well as controlled and descriptive studies of disease management. Best Practice Advice 1: Serology is a crucial component of the detection and diagnosis of CD, particularly tissue transglutaminase-immunoglobulin A (TG2-IgA), IgA testing, and less frequently, endomysial IgA testing. Best Practice Advice 2: Thorough histological analysis of duodenal biopsies with Marsh classification, counting of lymphocytes per high-power field, and morphometry is important for diagnosis as well as for differential diagnosis. Best Practice Advice 2a: TG2-IgA, at high levels (> ×10 upper normal limit) is a reliable and accurate test for diagnosing active CD. When such a strongly positive TG2-IgA is combined with a positive endomysial antibody in a second blood sample, the positive predictive value for CD is virtually 100%. In adults, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and duodenal biopsies may then be performed for purposes of differential diagnosis. Best Practice Advice 3: IgA deficiency is an infrequent but important explanation for why patients with CD may be negative on IgA isotype testing despite strong suspicion. Measuring total IgA levels, IgG deamidated gliadin antibody tests, and TG2-IgG testing in that circumstance is recommended. Best Practice Advice 4: IgG isotype testing for TG2 antibody is not specific in the absence of IgA deficiency. Best Practice Advice 5: In patients found to have CD first by intestinal biopsies, celiac-specific serology should be undertaken as a confirmatory test before initiation of a gluten-free diet (GFD). Best Practice Advice 6: In patients in whom CD is strongly suspected in the face of negative biopsies, TG2-IgA should still be performed and, if positive, repeat biopsies might be considered either at that time or sometime in the future. Best Practice Advice 7: Reduction or avoidance of gluten before diagnostic testing is discouraged, as it may reduce the sensitivity of both serology and biopsy testing. Best Practice Advice 8: When patients have already started on a GFD before diagnosis, we suggest that the patient go back on a normal diet with 3 slices of wheat bread daily preferably for 1 to 3 months before repeat determination of TG2-IgA. Best Practice Advice 9: Determination of HLA-DQ2/DQ8 has a limited role in the diagnosis of CD. Its value is largely related to its negative predictive value to rule out CD in patients who are seronegative in the face of histologic changes, in patients who did not have serologic confirmation at the time of diagnosis, and in those patients with a historic diagnosis of CD; especially as very young children before the introduction of celiac-specific serology. MANAGEMENT Best Practice Advice 10: Celiac serology has a guarded role in the detection of continued intestinal injury, in particular as to sensitivity, as negative serology in a treated patient does not guarantee that the intestinal mucosa has healed. Persistently positive serology usually indicates ongoing intestinal damage and gluten exposure. Follow-up serology should be performed 6 and 12 months after diagnosis, and yearly thereafter. Best Practice Advice 11: Patients with persistent or relapsing symptoms, without other obvious explanations for those symptoms, should undergo endoscopic biopsies to determine healing even in the presence of negative TG2-IgA.